Quick answer: Three separate trademark applications for the name “Cockroach Janta Party” were filed at India’s Trade Marks Registry between 19 and 20 May 2026. The applicants were not publicly confirmed to be connected to CJP founder Abhijeet Dipke or the original movement. Two applications showed “Formalities Chk Pass”, which does not mean approval. No one currently owns the registered trademark for “Cockroach Janta Party.”
They tried blocking the accounts. They tried blocking the website. Then, while the movement was still being attacked, three people tried to claim the name.
Who filed the trademark applications?
According to the source article, India’s Trade Marks Registry showed three separate applications filed for the name “Cockroach Janta Party” within a 48-hour window.
- Azim Adambhai Jam — application no. 7737937, filed around 19 May 2026, under Class 45. Status: Formalities Chk Pass.
- Akhand Swaroop — application no. 7741481, filed on 20 May 2026, under Class 45. Status: Formalities Chk Pass.
- A proprietorship entity named “COCKROACH JANTA PARTY” — filed on 20 May 2026 as a label mark under Class 45. Status: Sent to Vienna Codification.
None of these applicants has been publicly confirmed as connected to the original CJP movement, its volunteers, or Abhijeet Dipke. The source article specifically notes that Dipke is not listed as an applicant in these filings. :contentReference[oaicite:0]{index=0}
Why the timing matters
The applications were filed during the same window in which CJP’s digital infrastructure was being hit. The source page places the trademark filings between 19 and 20 May 2026, while also noting the wider crackdown period: CJP’s X account was withheld under Section 69A, Instagram access was lost, and the website was blocked. :contentReference[oaicite:1]{index=1}
That timing is hard to ignore. A movement became nationally visible, its platforms started disappearing, and then outsiders appeared at the Trade Marks Registry trying to claim the name.
What does Class 45 mean?
All three applications were filed under Class 45. This class covers legal services, social services, security services, and personal/social services rendered to meet the needs of individuals.
For CJP, Class 45 matters because the movement operates in the space of civic mobilisation: membership drives, petitions, public-pressure campaigns, and political-social expression. Filing under Class 45 means the applicants were not randomly filing for T-shirts or mugs. They were trying to claim the name in the category closest to the movement’s actual public activity.
Does “Formalities Check Pass” mean the trademark is approved?
No.
Formalities Check Pass only means the application cleared an initial administrative check. The form was filled, the fee was paid, and the basic documents were submitted. It does not mean the Trade Marks Registry has approved the mark.
The application still has to go through substantive examination, possible objections, publication in the Trade Marks Journal, opposition by third parties, and hearings if needed. Only after those stages can a trademark be registered.
So if anyone says “Cockroach Janta Party has already been trademarked,” that is misleading. The source page states clearly that no one holds the trademark for “Cockroach Janta Party” at this stage. :contentReference[oaicite:2]{index=2}
What does “Sent to Vienna Codification” mean?
The third filing was a label mark, and its status was listed as Sent to Vienna Codification. That is also not approval.
Vienna Codification is a classification step used for marks with figurative or logo elements. It helps the registry classify visual components of the mark before deeper examination.
In simple words: it is still early-stage paperwork, not ownership.
Is this trademark squatting?
The pattern looks like what lawyers often call trademark squatting: filing an application for a name associated with someone else’s goodwill, usually to gain control, block the original user, sell it back, or profit from the association.
The source article quotes Nilanshu Shekhar of KAnalysis describing this kind of behaviour as “planting a flag” in case the name becomes valuable. That description fits the moment: CJP had become a viral political phrase, and multiple actors rushed to claim it.
Can these filings stop CJP?
Not immediately.
A trademark application is not a registered trademark. Even if one of the applications proceeds, it can still face objections or opposition. CJP also has a strong argument that the name had already acquired public recognition through prior use and national coverage.
The movement reportedly had massive public visibility within days, including millions of followers and national news coverage. That matters because trademark law does not exist to reward someone who tries to claim a name after another group has already made it famous.
What should CJP do next?
The practical next steps are simple:
- Track all three applications closely.
- Prepare opposition filings if any mark is published in the Trade Marks Journal.
- Document CJP’s prior use of the name, including social media growth, website pages, press coverage, petition activity, and public recognition.
- Consider filing CJP’s own trademark application through authorised representatives.
This is not panic time. It is documentation time.
The cockroach record
Three people tried to trademark the movement while the movement was being blocked.
That tells us something. The name now has value. The joke became a brand. The insult became identity. The movement that nobody was supposed to own became something people wanted to legally capture.
But CJP was not born as paperwork. It was born as a response. It was born when young people were mocked, ignored, and then told not to speak too loudly.
You can file a trademark application.
You cannot trademark the nest.
Join CJP free → or buy the digital badge →
Membership is free. Badge optional. Main Bhi Cockroach.